On November 4, 2026, CMS placed the Calendar Year 2027 Physician Fee Schedule final rule (CMS-1848-F) on public inspection at the Federal Register. It publishes November 9 and takes effect January 1, 2027. This post covers the remote monitoring section in plain language, with the rule's own words where the wording matters, and it says plainly where Nsight is headed because of it. It is written for the practices we work with. It is a summary, not legal advice; your compliance counsel should read the sections that apply to you.
The short version
- Patients already on remote monitoring before January 1, 2027 continue as they are. No new requirement.
- From January 1, 2027, a new RPM or RTM patient needs an initiating visit with their practitioner, in person or by telehealth, where monitoring is discussed, before monitoring starts.
- CCM, PCM, BHI and APCM are not changed by this rule. The initiating-visit requirement and the staffing provision below apply to RPM and RTM only.
- The requirement that clinical staff furnishing RPM/RTM be direct employees of the billing practice was finalized with a start date of January 1, 2029. CMS will publish guidance on acceptable arrangements before then. Through December 31, 2028, today's arrangements continue.
- Payment: the treatment-management codes (99457, 99458) were not cut as proposed; they move only with the overall conversion factor, about 2 percent. The device-supply code (99454) steps down, by up to 19 percent in 2027 with a further step in 2028. Details in the payment section.
- Our read: this is good news for practices that do remote care well, and it is exactly the direction Nsight was already heading.
The dates that matter
- Now through December 31, 2026. Patients who start remote monitoring this year never need an initiating visit. A patient who is clinically appropriate, has an order and has consented can start now and continues in January without a visit.
- January 1, 2027. Rule effective. Initiating visit required for new RPM and RTM starts. RTM limited to established patients. First step of the device-code reduction. New conversion factor.
- January 2027. The AMA RUC re-reviews the practice-expense inputs for all 19 RPM and RTM codes, which feeds 2028 rates.
- December 31, 2027. Medicare telehealth flexibilities expire unless Congress extends them again.
- January 1, 2028. Second step of the device-code reduction, subject to the RUC review.
- January 1, 2029. Employed-staff provision for RPM and RTM. CMS guidance promised before this date.
The initiating visit, in detail
Beginning January 1, 2027, practitioners reporting RPM or RTM must furnish a separately reportable initiating visit before monitoring starts. From CMS's responses to comments:
- The visit is with the billing practitioner (or a same-specialty colleague in the same practice), and remote monitoring must be discussed at it, but it "does not have to be for the sole purpose of discussing remote monitoring services." An annual wellness visit or a routine follow-up counts, as long as you discuss remote monitoring and document it.
- In person or by telehealth. Medicare telehealth flexibilities run through December 31, 2027, so a telehealth visit counts as the initiating visit next year.
- No exemptions: "we are not finalizing any exemptions to initiating visit requirements, including for patients aligned to ACOs."
- One visit per start. "A separate visit is not required for routine clinical changes, which could include, but are not limited to a change of device, clinical change, or change of billing practitioner within the same practice." A move to a different practice does need a new visit.
- No new documentation requirement beyond what already applies to all fee-schedule services. The visit note should reflect that remote monitoring was discussed.
- Current patients are grandfathered: "beneficiaries who are already receiving remote monitoring services before this policy becomes effective on January 1, 2027, would not need to have an initiating visit to continue remote monitoring services, so long as all other requirements for these services are met."
We think this is a good change. Physicians should be seeing their patients regularly, and a visit before monitoring starts fits the care you already give. It also puts you in the room to recommend the program directly, and a patient whose own doctor explained why it matters enrolls with more confidence, stays on the program longer and takes their readings more consistently.
How enrollment works from January
For patients already on monitoring, nothing changes. For CCM, nothing changes. The new step applies to one situation: a patient starting remote monitoring on or after January 1, 2027. For that patient, the order of events is:
- You see the patient and mention monitoring. Any visit counts, in person or by telehealth, whether or not it was scheduled with monitoring in mind. You discuss remote monitoring, you recommend it, and the note says so. Your Physician Sales Liaison tells you ahead of time which patients on your schedule qualify, and gives you a one-line template for the note.
- You send us the referral. One click from your EMR, or the template pasted into the chart with your order. That tells us the visit has happened.
- We do the rest. Our team calls the patient, confirms consent, ships the device and starts monitoring. The device never ships before the visit.
Our enrollment calls continue as they do today. We keep calling your eligible patients for CCM, and we keep telling them about remote monitoring while we have them. If a patient says yes to monitoring on one of those calls, we hold their start until you have seen them. For patients already in CCM who want to add monitoring, we can fold the conversation into their next scheduled appointment, or help you set up a short telehealth visit.
What is not changing
- CCM, PCM, BHI and APCM. No new initiating-visit requirement, no staffing restriction. For CCM the existing rule still applies: a provider visit within the 12 months before CCM starts, a provider order, and documented consent. CMS asked questions about CCM and APCM in this rule but decided nothing; watch the July 2027 proposed rule.
- General supervision. Clinical staff do not need the practitioner in the room for care-management or monitoring services.
- Outside technology. Software, devices, connectivity and logistics from outside companies remain allowed, and CMS said so directly. The staffing provision below is about clinical-staff time only.
- The bundled monthly codes. CMS described four possible all-inclusive G-codes for RPM and RTM as a comment solicitation only: "We will take the comments into consideration for possible future rulemaking." Nothing changes in 2027.
RTM: established patients
RTM now requires an established patient, which RPM already did. CMS uses the standard fee-schedule definition (a professional service from the practitioner or same-specialty group in the past three years) and clarified that "a beneficiary may be considered an established patient after they have met the initiating visit requirements."
The employed-staff provision, from January 1, 2029
The rule's words: "After consideration of public comments, we are finalizing that for the purposes of billing Medicare, beginning January 1, 2029, the RPM and RTM codes cannot be billed in cases where the service is not performed by clinical staff that is a direct employee of the practitioner or the practitioner's practice and contracting out to third-party companies will not be allowed after that time. Prior to this date, CMS will be publishing sub-regulatory guidance further clarifying clinical staff arrangements that may be appropriate for remote monitoring services."
Until then: "although we will continue to allow contracting out to third-party companies until December 31, 2028, all of the existing 'incident to' and other rules for billing remote monitoring services under the PFS must be met."
"Direct employee" is not further defined in the rule; that is what the promised guidance is for, and CMS's stated reason is the OIG findings on cold-calling and fragmented care, not the quality of any particular program. What it means for you: nothing changes through 2028, CMS will define the acceptable arrangements before 2029, and we are part of that conversation. We are building so that, whatever the guidance says, your practice has options with Nsight in 2029, including making the clinical-staff component a light lift for your own team through the automation we are rolling out now. There is nothing you need to decide today, and we will share what we know as we know it.
Rate Adjustments
CMS posts the final payment file later this month. Once the final rates are posted, your Customer Success Manager can put together your program’s 2027 projections on request. What the rule itself says:
- Treatment-management codes protected. CMS reversed its proposal: "we are not finalizing as proposed to eliminate direct PE inputs for CPT codes 99470, 99457, 99458, 98979, 98980, and 98981," agreeing that "clinical staff are often used when furnishing treatment management services." Their small movement is the conversion factor, which every code takes.
- Device and set-up codes. CMS finalized lower practice-expense inputs for 99453, 99454 and 99445 (and the RTM equivalents 98975, 98976, 98977, 98984, 98985), crosswalked to the self-measured blood pressure codes. Reductions of 20 percent or more are capped at 19 percent a year, so "many of these changes will be phased in over multiple calendar years." The AMA RUC re-reviews all 19 codes in January 2027 with new cost data from the field, and Nsight is contributing ours, so 2028 is a projection, not a final rate.
- Conversion factor. The 2027 non-APM conversion factor is projected at about $32.63, down $0.77 (2.31 percent) from $33.40.
- What it means. The value of a monitored month shifts from the device toward clinical time and care management. Documented management minutes, and eligible CCM and APCM patients, carry more of the value than they did. If you would like to walk through what this means for your panel, your Customer Success Manager will do it with you one-on-one.
Where Nsight is headed
This rule confirms the direction we were already going, and it is worth saying plainly.
- Remote care is here to stay. Rates and code structures will keep moving; the need for patients to be monitored between visits will not. We are confident in that, and we are building for it.
- The bar just went up, and we welcome it. A visit before monitoring starts, and a practitioner who is clinically involved, make it harder to run a program that does not actually care for patients. That protects your patients and it protects you. Nsight has served more than 110,000 patients over five years with licensed clinical staff; that record is the foundation for everything below.
- Technology built on millions of patient interactions. Five years of outreach and monitoring data tell us when a patient is most likely to answer, which message works, and what a drifting trend looks like before it becomes an emergency. We are putting that to work as AI that supports our clinical team rather than replacing it: AI-guided care assessments a nurse reviews, automated alert calls with a clinician behind every escalation, outreach timed to when each patient is most likely to respond, and analytics that flag a patient trending the wrong way so a clinician can bring it to you ahead of a crisis.
- Responsibly. We moved patients from human teams to assisted and automated workflows with quality assurance at every step. The right partner for the next three years is one that has done this at scale with people first, and has the data and the clinical record to automate safely.
- PCM, APCM and the other care-management programs sit alongside RPM, and they are where more of the value of a monitored month now lives. Ask your CSM.
- The guidance for 2029 comes first. Then options. You will not need to go anywhere else.
Questions practices are asking
- Did CMS ban companies like Nsight? No. CMS finalized a rule that, starting in 2029, practices can only count RPM and RTM clinical-staff time from their own employees. It does not apply until January 2029, it does not touch CCM or APCM, and CMS is still writing guidance on which arrangements qualify. Nothing about your program changes through 2028.
- What do I do differently in January? For new RPM patients, see them (in person or by telehealth) and note that remote monitoring was discussed before monitoring starts. Your current RPM patients are exempt. CCM is unchanged.
- Does the visit have to be about RPM? No. Any visit where monitoring is discussed and documented counts.
- My patient changed devices, or moved to my partner in the same practice. No new visit. Routine changes, including a change of billing practitioner within the same practice, do not require one.
- My patient is in an ACO. No exemption. The visit is required.
- Should we enroll patients before January? Yes, every patient who is clinically appropriate, has an order and has consented. They continue in January with no visit required. Enrollment follows clinical need, as it always has.
- Does the payment change for CCM? Not from this rule. The small 2027 movement in 99490 is the conversion factor, not a CCM policy change.
- What does my Physician Sales Liaison actually do? Sets up the referral path in your EMR, gives you the note template, sends you a list of patients worth a conversation, and follows up until referring is routine. Book time with yours: nsightcare.com/psl.
- Will you tell me what this means in dollars for my practice? For most programs the change is marginal. Your Customer Success Manager will walk through it with you one-on-one, and once CMS posts the final rates we will put your 2027 projections together on request.
Sources
- Federal Register public inspection document 2026-22743, filed November 4, 2026, publication November 9, 2026: federalregister.gov
- CMS-1848-F notice page: cms.gov
Questions about your program: reply to your Nsight team, email [email protected] or call 888-270-4225.


